Why Coke is freezing its marketing spend
Updated: May 20, 2020
Had a conversation with a client recently about Coke’s decision to freeze marketing spend, when evidence says you should maintain brand support (and research from Kantar suggests people have no problem with brands advertising anyway).
![Why Coke is freezing its marketing spend](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/09c4c6_3547aab57c4b47f58d8e6142d14583e6~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_453,h_582,al_c,q_80,enc_auto/09c4c6_3547aab57c4b47f58d8e6142d14583e6~mv2.jpg)
Thought I’d share conclusions we came to, and the ‘reasons why’ (for Coke at least) this makes for a fairly unique-ish case.
Sociability is central to Coke’s comms, which won’t necessarily play well (although, as many struggle with isolation, they could do ‘socially distant’ sociability: think Whassup).
2020 spend will be tied up in events that aren't happening (Premier League, Euro 2020, Olympics), with copy likely developed along these lines.
A lot of sales will be thru channels that are no longer accessible: impulse, pubs/bars, entertainment venues, food service.
Coke have unassailable brand equity strength after decades of investment – most probably won’t even notice given how embedded the brand is in society, culture and lives.
With their media clout, ‘donating to charity’ is still a big old bit of awareness and equity building marketing investment under another name!
It will be interesting to see how long their abstinence lasts.
Comments